Catherine Marie Reddington
Suggested by Pierre Alleur
Syracuse, Onondaga County, New York, USA. Students will be students, idiots will be idiots, and sometimes you have the two in one. As she could not recollect events of the previous night's bash where she had gotten herself wasted, party animal Catherine Reddington falsely cries rape against a male student. Even when evidence refutes her claims, she continues to MeToo herself all over the place. Welcome to yet another case of Hysteria speaking Louder than Justice!
April 23, 2017. A seemingly confused Catherine Marie Reddington reported to Syracuse Police Department and Syracuse University administration that she had been raped by a man after a Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity in upstate New York. According to court documents and the District Attorney, a month serious investigation which included a medical examination, rape kit and blood-work done within 26 hours of the alleged incident found no evidence of assault, drug use, nor even a sexual encounter between Catherine and the man she accused. The two engineering majors had woken up fully clothed, both claiming they remembered nothing from the night before.
However, as Catherine's false claims persisted the man was expelled from Syracuse University, but she did not end it there. She took to social media under the name of "Catherine Marie" in an intensified smear campaign against her male victim, in what appears to be an effort to please radical feminists by destroying a man's life. Her campaign also attacked a Syracuse University female admin for not believing her fictional version of events, in a line that included the woman's linked-in account for anyone who cared. Catherine also accused the police and the justice system of not doing enough for her.
"...I spent 6 months being deceived and ignored by law enforcement...", wrote Catherine Reddington, even though the same law-enforcement came to her aid almost immediately after she reported the alleged incident.
"I spent 6 months trying to a work a system that is supposed to work for me....", she added. Her message connotes an innocent man should be charged with a crime only because a woman feels so.
Catherine Reddington also included a full face photo of the man on the footer of her message exposing him to worse dangers in our gynocentric society. Eventually, her witch-hunt efforts paid off as Bohler Engineering fired the man from his summer internship position after she personally informed the firm of her allegations.
June 05, 2018. After a lot of damage had been done. "Thank you to everyone for reposting and spreading the word on the monster", Catherine Reddington wrote on Facebook. "Thank you to Bohler Engineering for taking a stand against this disgusting excuse of a man", she added, below facebook status: "Feeling happy".
June 25, 2018. The falsely accused man had enough and filed a US$6million lawsuit here against Catherine Marie Reddington for destroying his life with her unsubstantiated rape claims. It's about time. Although the lawsuit is unlikely to yield any results that could possibly compensate the male for his career losses and reputation damage (as we saw in the other case here), it could at least finally get Catherine Reddington to shut up, by law.
Unfortunately, the success of the MeToo poison in our society is not limited to the likes of Catherine Reddington's actions - be it a disgust at facts, a disregard for professionally conducted taxpayer-funded investigation, a trading off of reasoning for hysteria, and/or a full pack of feeling-based feminocentric mob-centered justice system choosing persistent witch-hunt over civilized proceedings. Her smear campaign netted over a thousand likes on Facebook and won her a lot of praise and encouragement in the comment section with people saying things in the lines of "you are brave", "you are strong", "proud of you", "thank you for sharing", etc. Even after it was revealed that Catherine Marie Reddington was lying, and the true victim in the whole drama was the man she accused, she continued to accumulate words of encouragement on social media, and unfortunately, also approvals to her social approvals.
Warning to a morally conscious reader that the comments below could be disturbing, a validation of not just a crime but an evil agenda to outlaw heterosexuality, by some rotten "women" if you read between the lines.
And you would be logical but mistaken to think these hysteria-approving words were only coming from women. In fact, many men with minds enslaved to feminism were making similarly gynocentric comments. Pause for thought to wonder if these men have ever been able to imagine themselves in the shoes of the true victim in this arena? I'm only guessing that in their fantasy world, it's either "a woman cannot lie" or "false accusations never happen", until it happens to them.
-- Update --
September 27, 2019. The falsely accused man's $6m defamation lawsuit goes to court, with attorneys from both sides making their case before a judge. Catherine Reddington's side requested a motion to dismiss the case, in their own wisdom as a direct argument against the 6 claims of defamatory statements in the lawsuit:
1. Catherine Reddington argues that the accused man's complaint fails to adequately allege that her statements (rape accusation) were false, further claiming that just because criminal charges were not brought against the man does not mean that the sexual assault did not happen. But actually, there is both forensic evidence and physical evidence that refuted Catherine Reddington's claim within the few days of making the claim.
2. Catherine Reddington asked the court to consider her statements as "substantially true", arguing that there are only fine "distinctions" between her statements and "the truth" that the falsely accused man acknowledges. In other words, her lies are just another version of the truth which may not be recognized by reality as factual. Feel free to wonder if she realized she was talking to a court rather than a cult.
3. Catherine Reddington argues that the court should dismiss the case because the text message she sent to the accused man's friend in May 2018, referring to him as a "monster", is just her own opinion, and therefore constitutes her freedom of speech. Right, in essence, Catherine means anyone can say shit to anyone about anyone because we all have opinions. So what if we humbly refer to her as a wayward b i t c h on this page just as our own opinion? wouldn't that constitute freedom of speech? It gets more interesting.
4. Catherine Reddington argues that her statements were motivated by a desire to prevent further sexual assaults. However, the falsely accused man satisfies the criteria of "wrongful means" by plausibly alleging that she committed the independent tort of defamation.
5. Catherine Reddington also argues that the accused man has not suffered any injury which can be attributed to her conduct. This one is like shooting a gun ten times at someone, and then just because the person is not dead, you ask them to prove that you intended to kill them. Catherine's own posted screenshot of reply from Bohler Engineering terminating the relationship with the accused man is just one in many examples of his career lifelines cut off by Catherine's false accusations.
6. Referring to her social media tagging of NJIT's page on a post she made on June 06, 2018, which stated: "A school that accepts recently expelled rapists...", Catherine Reddington argues that it was of no concern to the man she falsely accused, because, there was no "surrounding context." However, the post could be easily traced to her recent posts prior to that, in which she referred to the falsely accused man as a "rapist".
Both parties disputed whether the statements at issue are "arguably within the sphere of legitimate public concern," and thus whether the gross irresponsibility standard applies [under New York libel law]. However, the Court need not reach the issue because even if gross irresponsibility is the requisite level of fault, the falsely accused man satisfies that standard, according to reason.com.
The falsely accused man also adequately pled all elements of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage or business relations. Catherine Reddington "specifically targeted" his relationships with Syracuse and Bohler, allegedly making "knowingly false statements designed to interfere" with his standing. Her direct communications with these institutions "evidence a calculated purpose … to convince these third parties to cease their business relationships with" him. The case continues...
Related Tags: rape, sexual assault, party, new york, syracuse, university, college, engineering, drunk, frat, social media
Fictims © 2024